For our latest edition of "professional sports organizations really don't get it" we highlight the National Basketball League.
A Friday memo sent by the league to all players and Watch Illicit Desire (2017)coaches made a point of reinforcing an existing rule that everyone is required to stand for the national anthem. It then goes on to suggest other options for engaging with a protest that's gripped the NFL and spilled into the wider world.
SEE ALSO: Colbert gets audience to contest Trump's NFL claim with booingThese details come from ESPN, which obtained a copy of the memo sent by deputy commissioner Mark Tatum. He stopped short of making any specific threats, noting only that "the league office will determine how to deal with" anyone that doesn't comply.
Tatum notes that individual teams don't have the authority to waive the league-wide rule. He also adds that disciplinary actions in cases where players and/or coaches do not follow the rules should be left to the league.
The memo suggests pre-game remarks or a pre-recorded video as alternatives for those wishing to engage with the politics of the moment. Of course, setting institutional guidelines for what does and doesn't qualify as a "valid" protest diminishes the potential impact of such activities.
Tatum's memo followed comments by NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, who restated the NBA rules relating to the national anthem at a league meeting on Friday.
"It's been a rule as long as I've been involved with the league, and my expectation is that our players will continue to stand for the anthem," he said. Like Tatum's memo, Silver offered no specifics on the disciplinary actions that might be taken for those that break the rule, stating only that "we'll deal with it when it happens."
In essence, Silver's defense of the rule is: That's the way it's always been done. It's not the most compelling justification, especially given the wishy-washy "we'll cross that bridge later" plan for dealing with rule-breakers.
So now we wait. In this charged political climate, it seems inevitable that the very challenge of "You must not do this, because rules" will be met by a player or players who see things differently. The rule is only a rule because it's been written out; it remains to be seen what will happen when that rule is challenged.
(Editor: {typename type="name"/})
U.N. aims to make carbon emissions cost money at COP 25 climate talks
Reading Horizons: A new approach for struggling readers
Uber offers free rides after deadly shooting in Las Vegas
How to unlock your iPhone with Face ID while wearing a face mask
The cicadas aren't invading the U.S.
Facebook’s Oversight Board makes bizarre ruling in its first group of decisions
Check out Black History Month events online
Remastered 'Mass Effect' does something about those damn elevators
NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for April 17: Tips to solve Connections #206
Netflix's 'Spycraft' takes an uncomplicated look at complex issues
NYT Connections hints and answers for May 10: Tips to solve 'Connections' #699.
Elon Musk changes Twitter bio to #bitcoin, chaos ensues
接受PR>=1、BR>=1,流量相当,内容相关类链接。